Skip to content

Letter: Proposed amendments to Land Act

web1_20213-kdb-lettertoed-k_1

To the Ministry of Water of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship

RE: Land Act Amendments

Dear Minister Cullen,

On behalf of the East Kootenay Wildlife Association and it’s nine member organizations representing 3,700 individual members in the East Kootenay Region of BC, I would like to provide our written comments to the proposed amendment to the Land Act

Thankfully, the Vancouver Sun raised the awareness to British Columbians of this NDP governments intent to amend the Land Act which will give “legal effect” to decision-making powers for First Nations over Crown land. The amendments will ensure that such agreements “have the force of law.” It’s unconscionable that this government, elected by British Columbian’s, did not care to seek, openly and transparently, it’s constituents’ opinions, thoughts and concerns on such a plan before beginning the process. The NDP’s timeline for the consultation and the implementation of public land-use agreements is truly terrifying. The fact that the government intends to start drafting the amendments in February, nearly two months BEFORE the public consultation period ends clearly indicates to British Columbians how little this government truly cares about the content of those bills and that the opinions of ordinary British Columbians don’t matter.

Additionally, an analysis by McMillan LLP, a firm specializing in indigenous law: “These amendments would go much further than the Supreme Court of Canada’s rulings based on the recognition of Aboriginal rights set out in s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. While the Supreme Court has issued many decisions making clear Indigenous groups hold certain special rights, including the right to be consulted before decisions are made that could affect them, the Court has repeatedly stated that they do not have a veto over Crown land decision-making.” So, the question is: Why the urgency to advance amendments that are above and beyond those legally recognized as necessary without adequate, open and transparent engagement with British Columbians? In an election year, where the NDP may not form government again, why saddle another party and British Columbians with an ill conceived and poorly contrived amendment that will impact this and all future generations?

The EKWA supports and is committed to reconciliation and in working together to ensure a brighter future for all British Columbians. However, the provincial government has set this province on an uncertain trajectory, by launching a trivial public consultation on co-management of roughly 95 per cent of the land in British Columbia. The EKWA is deeply concerned about impact the amendments will have on the ability of British Columbians to steward, access, and enjoy nearly every inch of the province for recreation and business, while delivering effective veto power, disregarding the concepts of natural justice and procedural fairness.

We welcome the opportunity for fair, meaningful, open and transparent engagement to develop an approach that will ensure progress towards reconciliation and that will address the concerns of all British Columbians and ensure the fair and equitable ability to steward, access, and enjoy the Crown Lands of the/OUR province for recreation and business.

We ask the NDP halt the plan to amend the Land Act and to instead develop a more robust process that allows for, considers and includes feedback from all British Columbians.

Yours in Conservation.

Sincerely,

Kevin Podrasky, President

East Kootenay Wildlife Association



Carolyn Grant

About the Author: Carolyn Grant

I have been with the Kimberley Bulletin since 2001 and have enjoyed every moment of it.
Read more